News from May
2002 |
| |
|
Standing Room Only |
| May
31st |
|
"The most striking thing about the meeting was the turn
out. About a hundred and thirty people squeezed in the the
hall which meant it was standing room only for the late
comers."
Read the full
report of BACIT's high succesful 1st public meeting. You
can also read our press
release. |
| |
|
|
|
Public Meeting a Huge Success |
| May
30th |
|
Last night's public meeting organised
by BACIT was an overwhelming success. It was standing room
only as 130 to 140 people squeezed into the Church Hall. We
hope to have more details and pictures to within the next
couple of days.. |
| |
|
Trader Covers BACIT Meeting |
| May
24th |
|
This weeks Trader (page 5) carries a
next big, positive article on BACIT and next week's
meeting. |
| |
|
Britain in a Jam |
| May
24th |
|
On Monday 27th at 7.30pm BBC are
showing one of its 4
x 4 Reports focusing on traffic problems and public
transport. They have a competition for suggestions of ways to
improve the situation and discussion page. |
| |
|
Less Than a Week to Go |
| May
24th |
|
The agenda is being finalised for BACIT's first public
meeting which is taking place next Wednesday, the 29th. The
main presentation will be by Norman Shelly who has a lifetime
of experience and is world renown expert in trams and similar
transport systems. We will also have short presentation by
Peter Fox, railway engineer and Sheffield Supertram expert.
Plus a telephone link to traders on the Croydon tram route.
The evening will finish off with a question and answer
session.
All are welcome to what we hope will be an informative
evening. The meeting starts at 7.30pm at the Church Hall,
Church Street, Beeston. |
| |
|
Trip to Croydon |
| May
24th |
|
As some of you may of seen in the
Evening Post last night, BACIT are organising a coach trip to
see the Croydon Trams on the 7th July. Details are being
finalised but the expected cost is £15 per person. All are
welcome, whether pro or anti tram as this is a fact finding
trip. We especially hope that Chilwell Road traders and
residents of the controversial parts of the route such as
Richmond Court and Fletcher Road will come along and see the
reality of a modern tram system. |
| |
|
The Sheffield Story |
| May
24th |
|
From Sheffield resident, Paul Jackson.
"...it is like turning the clock back to the late 1980s
in Sheffield. Without exception all their arguments are the
same as we had.... The nice thing now though, is the amount of
times those who did their utmost to stop the tramway being
built are seen travelling on the TRAM. There are now no tram
opposition groups at all in the city, on the contrary there
are those who want the tram extended to their areas" Read
on. |
| |
|
The BCBRA Rumour Mill |
| May
23rd |
|
One of the most amazing things about the anti-tram
campaigners is the way they spread false rumours and
misinformation. BACIT have been told by three separate
anti-tram supporters that Nottingham County Council have
either thrown out or delayed approval for Lines Two &
Three. This is of course rubbish. As we reported on 20th, the
council voted on the 16th May by a large majority to push on
with the plans. I would like to be able to point you to either
the NETor
the Nottinghamshire County
Council web sites for more
detailed news but neither organisation has actually updated
their web sites with the news. However you can watch a webcast
of the meeting and download
the report of the NCC Cabinet prepared for the full
council meeting. |
| |
|
Notes From a Man in the Know |
| May
22nd |
|
Scott McIntosh, Croydon resident and Project Manager for
Croydon Tramlink has sent BACIT some comments about trams
covering a broad range of issues including
"Construction: If handled
carefully road access to properties can be maintained at all
times.... Loss of Trade: The Council found that the
rate of business failure and closures during construction was
NO HIGHER than in the preceding years. House Prices:
...NOT A SINGLE PROPERTY EXPERIENCED A FALL IN VALUE.
Inital Results: ... number of
people visiting the shops has increased by 11%. ...
Secondary
shopping areas are showing 100% occupancy...
Safety: Road accidents fell ..... Trams are also fitted
with extremely powerful magnetic brakes .... provide double
the normal braking – irrespective of rail and road
condition."
Read the document in full. |
| |
|
Cannot be worse |
| May
22th |
|
BCBRA,
the anti-tram group, like to think they speak for everyone in
Beeston. Here at BACIT we often receive notes of support from
people on and off the tram route including this one from a
residence on Chilwell Road very close to a prominent anti-tram
campaigner's business.
"Dear Mr Barber Re:BACIT You have all our support
re: the tram. We feel that our street cannot possibly be worse
than it is now!"
Which neatly summarises BACIT's view that the tram will be
good for residents and businesses in Beeston. |
| |
|
Tram Threat to High Rd Shops? What
Threat? |
| May
20th |
|
"One of the most vocal band of
anti-tram campaigners are the retailers on Chilwell Road."
Find out why their fears are unfounded. |
| |
|
Councils Accept Net Recommendations |
| May
20th |
|
Last Thursday (16th May), Nottinghamshire County Council
voted by a substantial majority to accept NET's
recommendations for lines 2 and 3 serving Chilwell and
Clifton. The City Council had already voted in favour. This
now paves the way for NET to proceed to the next stages of
seeking funding from Central Government and to prepare
detailed plans to obtain a Transport and Works Act Order
(TWAO). It is likely that this will take at least seven or
eight months.
You can read BACIT's press release here. |
| |
|
BACIT Leaflet & Poster |
| May
14th |
|
Want to show your support for the
tram or pass on information to someone else? Here are BACIT's
new poster
and leaflet
online ready for you to print. |
| |
|
Another Anti-Tram Discrepancy |
| May
14th |
|
In the
BCBRA
April Newsletter it claimed that "Independent research
shows that tram noise in Sheffield falls outside
government-set levels for residential areas". So we BACIT
emailed the Department of
the Environment, Transport and the Regions to find out
what those levels might be (we also emailed BCBRA and had no
reply). The DETR was:
"Thank you very much for your email. I contacted the
Health and Safety Executive about your questions and they in
turn have taken advice from Her Majesty's Railway
Inspectorate. HMRI is not aware of any regulations which
specifically limit noise from trams in the public
highway."
Another BCBRA lie put to rest. Read the DETR full
response. |
| |